Does Background Music Help You Study? What Studies Found
For reading and memorizing, the research does not show that background music helps, and some of it points the other way. A 2011 meta-analysis found that background music tended to disturb reading and had small harmful effects on memory. That is an average across studies, not a rule for every person or every kind of music.
1. What the 2011 meta-analysis found
Kampfe, Sedlmeier, and Renkewitz pooled studies of background music's effects on adult listeners and published the results in Psychology of Music. A global analysis showed a null effect: across all outcomes, music neither helped nor hurt on average. The authors explain that this null result was most probably due to averaging out specific effects that point in different directions.
When they compared studies of background music against no music, they found these specific effects:
- Background music disturbs the reading process.
- It has some small detrimental effects on memory.
- It has a positive impact on emotional reactions.
- It improves achievements in sports.
- The tempo of the music influences the tempo of activities performed while listening.
The authors also say that the studies allowing an effect size to be calculated were scarce, so the chance of detecting specific effects was not high. They call for more specific theories and better methodological quality in this research. So the best summary is cautious: the pooled evidence leans against music for reading, but it is a thin literature.
2. A failed replication
A related claim is that background music harms language comprehension in people with musical training but not in people without it. Haning (2016) tried to replicate that finding. Participants with musical training (N = 35) and without (N = 15) took a 30-item reading comprehension test, assigned at random to silence or background music. There was no significant effect of music training, no significant effect of background music, and no interaction between them. The abstract says these results were inconsistent with earlier researchers' findings and that more research is needed.
The sample was small, especially the group without musical training, so this does not prove music is harmless. It does show that one proposed pattern did not replicate.
3. Speech is a different problem from music
If you study with talking in the background, the evidence is clearer. A 2019 paper in Scientific Reports notes that the effects of irrelevant background speech on immediate serial recall of verbal material are well established. The authors tested whether speech also hurts memory for faces. Participants learned faces in quiet, while ignoring changing sequences (sentences), or while ignoring steady sequences (repeated words). Face recognition was worse with irrelevant speech than in quiet, and changing speech disrupted more than steady repetition. A second study with reversed speech, which has no meaning, found the same pattern, suggesting the disruption does not depend on what the words mean.
For study purposes, this suggests that a podcast or a nearby conversation is a poor background for learning. The study tested faces, not text, and not music with lyrics, so do not read it as a ruling on songs.
4. Replication status
As of October 2026, the sources here show a mixed and unsettled picture. The 2011 meta-analysis found a null overall effect with small harms to reading and memory. The 2016 attempt to replicate a musician-specific effect found nothing. The speech-disruption result is described as well established for serial recall and was replicated within the 2019 paper. There is no cited evidence here that music improves reading comprehension or memory.
5. What to do with this
The evidence does not tell any individual what works for them, but it supports a few choices:
- For reading, the 2011 meta-analysis found disturbance from music, so silence is the safer choice, and speech is the worst background.
- The meta-analysis did find a positive impact of music on emotional reactions, but it does not say that improves studying.
- If you suspect music is costing you comprehension, run a fair test on yourself: study a similar passage with and without music, then quiz yourself the next day from memory.
- Keep talk out of the room while you memorize.
6. Key takeaways
- A 2011 meta-analysis found background music disturbs reading and has small detrimental effects on memory, though its global effect was null.
- The same analysis found positive effects on emotional reactions and sports performance.
- A 2016 replication attempt found no effect of background music on adult reading comprehension, with or without musical training.
- Irrelevant speech is the stronger disruptor: it impaired face learning in 2019, and changing speech was worse than steady repetition.
- The music literature is thin, so treat every conclusion as provisional.
Sources
- Kampfe, Sedlmeier & Renkewitz, The Impact of Background Music on Adult Listeners: A Meta-Analysis, Psychology of Music 2011
- Haning, The Association between Music Training, Background Music, and Adult Reading Comprehension, Contributions to Music Education 2016
- Bell, Mieth, Roer & Buchner, Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory, Scientific Reports 2019
More on learning from other topics
- Fewer vs Less: The Rule, the Exceptions, and Email Fixes · Clear English Writing
- Scientific Notation: How to Write It and Calculate With It · Math Homework Help
- How Do Clouds Form, and Why Do They Float? · Science for the Curious